[动态计算OFFSET值的方法 ]的搜索结果

...是开源软件开发的最佳方法，也是向客户提供开源福利的最佳方式”他说，“很高兴看到IT领导者们也认识到了这一点。” 为了和这些公司一起作出贡献，公司也需要有自己的开源策略，而拥有一个开源计划办公室则可以为其提供帮助。 “在使用开源软件方面，OPSO为公司提供了一个至关重要的能力中心”他说。 这与公司拥有安全运营中心的方式类似，他说。 “围绕一个项目而发展的开发人员社区，有助于代码库的形成，并吸引更多的开发人员参与，这可以变成一个良性循环。” ——Tom Hickman，ThreatX 首席创新官 “如果你对安全团队进行相应投资，你通常是不会期望你的软件是安全的，也无法及时应对安全事件。”他说。 “同样的逻辑也适用于 OSPO，这就是为什么你会看到许多领先的公司，例如Apple、Meta、Twitter、Goldman Sachs、Bloomberg 和 Google 都拥有 OSPO。他们走在了趋势的前面。” 而对组织内的开源活动的支持态度亦可成为软件供应商们的差异化原因与营销的机会。 根据Red Hat 2月分发布的一项调查，82%的IT领导者更倾向于选择为开源社区作出贡献的软件供应商。 受访者表示，当供应商支持开源社区时，就表示着他们更熟悉开源的流程并且在客户遇到技术难题时会更加有效。 但收益的不仅仅是软件供应商们。 根据 The New Stack、Linux Foundation Research 和 TODO Group 9 月份的调查，57% 拥有 OSPO 的组织将使用它们来进一步发展战略关系和建立合作伙伴关系。 十年前，Mark Hinkle 在 Citrix 工作时创办了一个开源计划办公室。他指出了在内部拥有一个 OSPO将如何使公司受益。 “对于我们来说，最大的工作是让不熟悉开源的员工学会并参与其中，成为优秀的社区成员”，他说，“我们还就如何确保我们的IP不会在没有正确理解的情况下进入项目的情况提供了指导，并确保我们没有与我们企业软件许可相冲突的开源项目合作。” 他说，OSPO还帮助Citrix确定了公司参与开源项目和Linux基金会等贸易组织的战略机会。 如今，他是云原生开源集成平台 TriggerMesh 的首席执行官兼联合创始人。 他说，参与开源系统对公司来说有着重大的经济效益。 “我们参与Knative是为了分享我们基础底层平台的开发，但作为业务的一部分，我们也拥有相关的增值服务。”他说，“通过共享该平台的研发，这为我们提供了更多的资源来改进我们自己的差异化技术。” Part4如何入门开源 在 The New Stack、Linux Foundation Research 和 TODO Group 的 9 月份调查中，有 63% 的公司表示，拥有OSPO 对其工程或产品团队的成功至关重要，高于上一年度该项研究数据的 54%。 其中77% 的人表示他们的开源程序对他们的软件实践产生了积极影响，例如提高了代码质量。 但公司也不可能总是为他们使用的每一个开源项目而花费精力。 “首先，节流一下”，VMware 的 Ambiel 建议道。 公司应该关注投入使用中最有意义的项目。而这也是OSPO可以帮助确定优先事项并确保技术与战略一致性的领域。 之后，开发人员应该自己去了解一下。项目通常提供相关在线文档，一般包含贡献着指南、治理文档和未解决问题列表。 “对于那些你较感兴趣的项目中，你可以介绍一下自己----打个招呼”，她说。“然后转到Slack频道或者分发列表，询问他们需要帮助的地方。也许他们不需要帮助，一切完好；又或者他们也有可能使用新人来审查核验代码。” Ambiel 说，开源计划办公室不仅可以帮助制定为开源社区做出贡献的商业案例，还可以帮助公司以安全、可靠和健全的方式来做这件事。 “如果我为一家公司工作，并想为开源做出贡献，我不想意外披露、泄露或破坏任何专利，”她说。“而OSPO可以帮助您做出明智的选择。” 她说，OSPO还可以在开源方面提供领导力和指导理念的支持。“它可以提供引领、指导、辅导和最佳实践的作用。” Aqua Security的开发人员倡导者Anaïs Urlichs则认为，支持开源的承诺必须从高层开始。 她说，“公司在多数时候往往不重视对开源的投资，所以员工自然而然不被鼓励对此作出贡献。” 在这些情况下，员工对于开源的热情也会在空闲时间里对开源的建设而消散殆尽，这对于开源的发展来说是不可持续的。 “如果公司对开源项目依赖度高，那么将开源贡献纳入工程师的日程安排是很重要的，”她说。“一些公司定义了员工可以为开源建设的时间百分比，将其作为他们正常工作日的一部分。” The New Stack 是 Insight Partners 的全资子公司，Insight Partners 是本文提到的以下公司的投资者：Sysdig、Aqua Security。 中英对照版 How an OSPO Can Help Your Engineers Give Back to Open Source OSPO （开源项目办公室）是如何使工程师回馈开源的 When it comes to open source software, there’s a big and growing problem: most organizations are takers, not givers. 谈到开源软件，有一个较大且日益严重的问题：大多数组织都是索取者，而不是给予者。 There’s a classic XKCD comic that shows a giant structure representing modern digital infrastructure, dependent on a tiny component created by “some random person in Nebraska” who has been “thanklessly maintaining since 2003.” 经典漫画XKCD展示了一个代表现代数字基础设施的巨大结构，它依赖于“内布拉斯加州的某位人士”创建的微小组件，该组件“自2003年来一直都处于吃力不讨好的状态”。 Randall Monroe’s XKCD comic illustrates the open source dilemma: overreliance on a small number of volunteer project maintainers. Randall Monroe 的XKCD漫画展示了目前开源面临的窘境：过度依赖少数项目维护志愿者的志愿服务。 This would have been funny, except that this is exactly what happened when security vulnerabilities were discovered in Log4j last December. （开源项目由志愿者自发来维护，）这听起来像是一件很滑稽的事情，但事实上去年十二月在Log4j中发现的安全漏洞也确实存在着上述情况。 The Java-based logging tool is ubiquitous in enterprise publications. In the last three months, for example, Log4j has been downloaded more than 30 million times, according to a report by the enterprise software company Sonatype. 然而这个基于Java的日志记录工具已经在企业内部刊物中无处不在。例如根据软件公司Sonatype的一份报告显示，在过去的三个月里，Log4j的下载量就已经超过3000万次。 The tool has 440,000 lines of code, according to Synopsys‘ Black Duck Open Hub research tool, with nearly 24,000 contributions by nearly 200 developers. That’s a large dev team compared to other open source projects. But looking closer at the numbers, more than 70% of commits were by just five people. 根据Synopsys(新思）公司旗下的Black Duck Open Hub 研究工具显示。Log4j有着440,000行代码，由近200名开发人员贡献了将近24,000行代码。其实与其他开源项目相比，这是一个庞大的开发团队。但是如果关注数据的话，就会发现超过70%的提交是仅仅靠五个人来完成的。 Log4j’s home page lists about a dozen members on its project team. Most projects have far fewer developers working on them — and that presents a problem for the organizations that depend on them. Log4j的主页上展示了十几位项目团队的成员。而大多项目的开发人员要比其原本需要的少得多----这是高度依赖开发人员团队所呈现出来的问题。 “There is little incentive for anyone today to contribute to an existing open source project,” said Jeremy Stretch, distinguished engineer at NS1, a DNS network company. “There’s usually no direct compensation, and few accolades are offered — most users don’t even know who maintains the software that they use.” “如今的人没有什么动力去为现有的开源项目做贡献”，来自DNS网络公司NS1的杰出工程师Jeremy Strech说，“因为通常来说，这没有直接的物质回报，也很少提供荣誉----大多数用户甚至不知道他们所用的软件是谁维护的。” The most common motivation among open source contributors is to add a feature that they themselves want to see, he said. “Once this has been achieved, the contributor rarely sticks around.” 他说，开源贡献者们最常见的动机就是添加他们自己想要的功能。“一旦实现了这一点，他们几乎都不会留下来。” Meanwhile, as a project becomes more popular, the burden on the core team of maintainers keeps increasing. 与此同时，随着项目的逐渐流行，对于维护方面的核心团队来说，他们的负担也在不断增加。 “More users means more feature requests and more bug reports — but not more maintainers,” Stretch said. “What was once an enjoyable hobby can quickly become a tedious chore, and many maintainers understandably opt to simply abandon their projects altogether.” “更多的用户意味有着更多的功能需求和错误报告----但不是更多的维护人员”，Stretch说。“曾经令人愉快的爱好很快就会变成一项乏味的项目，所以很多维护人员选择干脆完全放弃他们的项目，这也是可以理解的。” Part1The Tragedy of the Commons The open source software ecosystem is a perfect example of the “tragedy of the commons.” 开源软件的生态系统，就是“公地悲剧”的一个完美例子。 And the tragedy is — when everyone uses, but no one contributes, that resource — whether it’s an overrun park or an open source project — eventually collapses from overuse and underinvestment. Everyone loves using free stuff, but everyone expects someone else to take care of it. 这个悲剧就是---当一种资源，无论是一个超限的公园还是一个开源项目，所有人都在使用而没有人贡献之时，最终都会因为过度使用和投入不足而崩溃坍塌。 This approach can save you money in the short term, but it can become a fatal flaw over time. Especially since open source software is everywhere, running everything. 这种方式可以在短期内为你节省资金，但随着时间的推移，它可能会变成项目里致命的缺陷。 Linux, for example, the open source operating system, runs on 96% of the world’s top 1 million servers, and 90% of all cloud infrastructure is on Linux. Not to mention that 85% of all smartphones in the world run Linux, in the form of the Android OS. 拿Linux来说，这个开源操作系统在全球前100万台服务器中运行率在96%以上，且这些服务器90%的云基础设施也都在Linux上。更不用说世界上85%的智能手机都运行着Linux，即Android操作系统。 Then there’s Java, Apache, WordPress, Cassandra, Hadoop, MySQL, PHP, ElasticSearch, Kubernetes — the list of ubiquitous open source projects goes on and on. 还有Java, Apache, WordPress, Cassandra, Hadoop, MySQL, PHP, ElasticSearch, Kubernetes--这些常见开源项目的列表还在逐渐增加着。 Without open source, much of today’s technical infrastructure would immediately grind to a halt. 如果没有开源，今天的大部分技术基础设施的建设也将会戛然而止。 “It is a real problem,” said Danil Mikhailov, executive director at Data.org, a nonprofit backed by the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth and The Rockefeller Foundation that promotes the use of data science to tackle society’s greatest challenges. “这是一个很现实的问题”，Data.org的执行董事Danil Mikhailov说，该组织是由万事达包容性发展中心和洛克菲勒基金会支持，旨在促进使用数据科学来应对当今社会所面临的巨大挑战的非营利性组织。 While nearly all organizations use open source software, only a minority contribute to those projects. Forty-two percent of participants in a survey released in September by The New Stack, Linux Foundation Research, and the TODO Group said tthey contribute at least sometimes to open source projects. 虽然几乎所有组织都在使用着开源软件，但只有少数组织为这些项目作出了贡献。The New Stack、Linux Foundation Research 和 TODO Group 在 9 月发布的一项调查中，42% 的参与者表示，他们至少有时会为开源项目做出贡献。 The same study showed that only 36% of organizations train their engineers to contribute to open source. 而同一项研究表明，只有36%的组织会培训他们的工程师为开源作出贡献。 Individual companies should support projects that they use the most and are critical to their success, Mikhailov said: “If you use, you contribute.” 个体公司应该支持贡献这些他们使用最多且对他们成功至关重要的项目，Mikhailov认为：“如果你使用开源，你就应该为他做出属于你自己的贡献。” Part2OSPO Benefits:Less Tech Debt,Better Recruiting Participating in open source communities — especially when guided by an in-house open source program office (OSPO) — can help ensure the health of projects critical to your organization’s success, improve those projects’ security, and allow your engineers to have more impact in the projects’ development road map. 参与开源社区——特别是在内部开源项目办公室（OSPO）的指导下——不仅可以保证对组织成功至关重要项目的健康发展，还可以提高项目安全性，同时可以允许工程师在项目发展规划中起到更大的影响。 Say, for example, a company uses an open source tool and modifies it a little to make it better. If that improvement isn’t contributed back to the community, then the official version of the open source project will start to diverge from what the company is using 例如，如果一家公司使用了开源工具，并对其进行了一些调整使其变得更好。但如果这项改进没有反馈到开源社区，那么开源项目的正式版本就会一开始与该公司所使用的版本有所不同。 “You start to grow technical debt because when the original source changes and you’ve got a different version. Those differences grow rapidly, compounding daily. It doesn’t take long for you to be the proud user and maintainer of a one-of-a-kind open source project variant,” said Suzanne Ambiel, director, open source marketing and strategy at VMware. “当原始代码来源发生变化且你所使用的是不同的版本时，你的技术负债将越来越多。而这些差异是以天为单位迅速增长的。”VMware 开源营销和战略总监 Suzanne Ambiel 表示，“所以你很快就会变成一个开源项目里独一无二变体的‘自豪’用户和维护人员。” “The technical debt gets bigger and bigger and it gets very expensive for a company to manage.” “如果技术负债越来越多，那么公司的管理成本则会非常昂贵”。 Support for open source activity can also be a recruiting tool. “It’s really a talent magnet,” said Ambiel. “It’s one of the things that new hires look for.” 实际上对于开源活动的支持也变成了一种招聘途径。“这真是一块吸引人才的磁铁，”Ambiel说，“这也是新员工所寻求的“。 Some engineering managers might worry that open source contributions will detract from core product development, she said. Their rationale, she added, might run along the lines of, “I only have so much talent, and so many hours, and I need them to only work on things where I can measure and see the return on investment.” 她还提到，一些工程经理可能会对贡献开源而减损核心产品的开发的精力而感到担忧。她补充到，他们的理由有可能是这样的：“我只有有限的才华与时间，且我需要这些只做我认为可以度量且看到投资回报的事情。” But that attitude, she said, is shortsighted. Supporting employees who contribute to open source communities can build skills and develop talent, she said. 但她说，这是一种鼠目寸光的态度。支持开源社区并且作出贡献的员工，可以从中培养技能与增长才华。 Loris Degionni, chief technology officer and founder at Sysdig, a cloud security vendor, echoed this notion: “Finding employees who contribute to open source is a gold mine,” said. 云安全供应商 Sysdig 的首席技术官兼创始人 Loris Degionni 也赞同这一观点：“找出为开源做出贡献的员工无疑就找到一座金矿，”他说。 These employees are more capable of delivering features a company wants to use and merge them into community-supported standards, he said. And in a war for talent, companies that embrace open source are more attractive to developers. 他认为，这些参与开源的员工更具备公司想拥有的竞争力并将一些功能融入至社区所支持的标准中。且在人才争夺战中，拥抱开源的公司也更受到开发人员的青睐。 “Lastly, open source is driven by a community of technical experts you may not be able to hire,” he said. “When employees actively contribute and collaborate with these experts, they’ll be better informed of best practices and bring them back to your organization. “最后，开源项目是由你可能无法聘请的技术专家社区推动的”，他说，“当员工积极参与并于这些专家合作时，他们将能更好地深入这些最佳实践，并将这些收获带回到你的组织之中。” “You start to grow technical debt because when the original source changes and you’ve got a different version … It doesn’t take long for you to be the proud user and maintainer of a one-of-a-kind open source project variant.” —Suzanne Ambiel, director, open source marketing and strategy, VMware “当原始数据来源发生变化且你所使用的是不同的版本时，你的技术负债将越来越多...所以你很快就会变成一个开源项目里独一无二变体的”自豪“用户和维护人员。” — Suzanne Ambiel，VMware 开源营销和战略总监 “All of this should be rewarded — developers shouldn’t have to spend their free time honing their skills, as your company will quickly see benefits from their efforts.” “但是这一切终究不会白费--开发人员不应该把业余时间用在磨练他们的技能上，因为你的公司很快就会在他们的努力中看到好处。” An OSPO, Degionni suggested, can help achieve these goals, as well as help prioritize contributions and ensure collaboration. In addition, they can help provide governance that mirrors what companies would have for internally developed applications. Degionni认为，OSPO（开源计划办公室）可以帮助公司实现这些目标，以及帮助确定贡献的优先级并确保合作的进行。除此之外，他们也可以对公司内部开发应用程序方面的治理提供相关帮助。 “Members of the open source team are also in a position to be great internal evangelists for open source technologies, and act as bridges between the organization and the broader community,” he added. “开源团队的成员也可以成为开源技术的伟大内部布道师，并充当组织与更广泛社区之间的桥梁。”他补充道。 In the September survey from The New Stack, Linux Foundation Research and the TODO Group, nearly 53% of organizations with OSPOs said they saw more innovation as a result of having an OSPO, while almost 43% said they saw increased participation in external open source projects. 在 The New Stack、Linux Foundation Research 和 TODO Group 的 9 月调查中，近 53% 的拥有 OSPO的组织表示，由于拥有了OSPO，他们看到了更多创新，而近 43% 的组织表示，他们在外部开源项目的参与度上有所增加。 Part3More OSPO Benefits:A Business Edge Contributing to open source communities doesn’t just help the communities, but the companies that contribute to them, said Tom Hickman, chief innovation officer at ThreatX, a cybersecurity firm. 网络安全公司 ThreatX 的首席创新官 Tom Hickman 表示，为开源社区做出贡献，不仅有助于社区，还有助于为社区做出贡献的公司。 “Growing the community of developers around a project helps the code base, and attracts more developers,” he said. “It can become a virtuous circle.” “围绕一个项目而发展的开发人员社区，有助于代码库的形成，并吸引更多的开发人员参与”，他说，“这可以变成一个良性循环。” Also, companies that contribute to open source projects get twice the productive value from their use of open source than companies that don’t, according to research by Harvard Business School. 此外，根据哈佛商学院的研究，为开源项目作出贡献的公司从使用开源的项目中获得的生产价值，是不参与开源项目公司的两倍。 Many of the biggest companies in the world are contributing to open source, said Chris Aniszczyk, chief technology officer at Cloud Native Computing Foundation. He pointed to the Open Source Contributor Index as a reference for exactly just how much companies are doing. Cloud Native Computing Foundation 的首席技术官 Chris Aniszczyk 说，世界上许多巨头公司都为开源作出了贡献。他还提到，开源贡献者的指数是作为公司是否有所作为的参考。 The tech giants dominate the list: Google, Microsoft, Red Hat, Intel, IBM, Amazon, Facebook, VMware, GitHub and SAP are the top 10 contributors, in that order. But there are also a lot of end users on the top 100 list, said Aniszczyk, including Uber, the BBC, Orange, Netflix, and Square. 科技巨头占据了这份榜单的主导地位：谷歌、微软、红帽、英特尔、IBM、亚马逊、Facebook、VMware、GitHub 和 SAP 依次是排名前 10 的贡献者。但Aniszczyk 表示，但也有很多终端用户公司进入前 100 名，包括 Uber、BBC、Orange、Netflix 和 Square。 “We’ve always known working in upstream projects is not just the right thing to do —it’s the best approach to open source software development and the best way to deliver open source benefits to our customers,” he said. “It’s great to see that IT leaders recognize this as well.” “我们一直知道，在上游项目中工作不仅仅是关正确与否----它是开源软件开发的最佳方法，也是向客户提供开源福利的最佳方式“他说，“很高兴看到IT领导者们也认识到了这一点。” To contribute alongside these giants, companies need to have their own open source strategies, and having an open source program office can help. 为了和这些公司一起作出贡献，公司也需要有自己的开源策略，而拥有一个开源项目办公室则可以为其提供帮助。 “OSPOs provide a critical center of competency in a company when it comes to utilizing open source software,” he said. “在使用开源软件方面，OPSO为公司提供了一个至关重要的能力中心”他说。 It’s similar to the way that companies have security operations centers, he said. 这与公司拥有安全运营中心的方式类似，他说。 “Growing the community of developers around a project helps the code base, and attracts more developers. It can become a virtuous circle.” —Tom Hickman, chief innovation officer, ThreatX “围绕一个项目而发展的开发人员社区，有助于代码库的形成，并吸引更多的开发人员参与，这可以变成一个良性循环。” ——Tom Hickman，ThreatX 首席创新官 “If you don’t make the investment in a security team, you generally don’t expect your software to be secure or be able to respond to security incidents in a timely fashion,” he said. “如果你没有对安全团队进行相应投资，你通常是不会期望你的软件是安全的，也无法及时响应安全事件。”他说。 “The same logic applies to OSPOs and is why you see many leading companies out there such as Apple, Meta, Twitter, Goldman Sachs, Bloomberg, and Google all have OSPOs. They are ahead of the curve.” “同样的逻辑也适用于 OSPO，这就是为什么你会看到许多领先的公司，例如 Apple、Meta、Twitter、Goldman Sachs、Bloomberg 和 Google 都拥有 OSPO。他们走在了趋势的前面。” Support for open source activity within your organization can become a differentiator and marketing opportunity for software vendors. 而对组织内的开源活动的支持态度亦可成为软件供应商们的差异化原因与营销的机会。 According to a Red Hat survey released in February, 82% of IT leaders are more likely to select a vendor who contributes to the open source community. 根据Red Hat2月分发布的一项调查，82%的IT领导者更倾向于选择为开源社区作出贡献的软件供应商。 Respondents said that when vendors support open source communities they are more familiar with open source processes and are more effective if customers have technical challenges. 受访者表示，当供应商支持开源社区时，就表示着他们更熟悉开源的流程并且在客户遇到技术难题时会更加有效。 But it’s not just software vendors who benefit. 但收益的不仅仅是软件供应商们。 According to September’s survey by The New Stack, Linux Foundation Research, and the TODO Group, 57% of organizations with OSPOs use them to further strategic relationships and build partnerships. 根据 The New Stack、Linux Foundation Research 和 TODO Group 9 月份的调查，57% 拥有 OSPO 的组织将使用它们来进一步发展战略关系和建立合作伙伴关系。 Mark Hinkle started an open source program office back when he worked at Citrix a decade ago. He pointed out how having an OSPO in-house benefited the company. 十年前，Mark Hinkle 在 Citrix 工作时创办了一个开源计划办公室。他指出了在内部拥有一个 OSPO将如何使公司受益。 “For us the biggest job was to educate our employees who weren’t familiar with open source to get involved and be good community members,” he said. “We also provided guidance on how to make sure our IP didn’t enter projects without proper understanding and we made sure we didn’t incorporate open source that conflicted with our enterprise software licensing.” “对于我们来说，最大的工作是让不熟悉开源的员工学会并参与其中，成为优秀的社区成员”，他说，“我们还就如何确保我们的IP不会在没有正确理解的情况下进入项目的情况提供了指导，并确保我们没有与我们企业软件许可相冲突的开源项目合作。” The OSPO also helped Citrix identify strategic opportunities for the company to participate in open source projects and trade organizations like The Linux Foundation, he said. 他说，OSPO还帮助Citrix确定了公司参与开源项目和Linux基金会等贸易组织的战略机会。 Today, he’s the CEO and co-founder of TriggerMesh, a cloud native, open source integration platform. 如今，他是云原生开源集成平台 TriggerMesh 的首席执行官兼联合创始人。 There are some significant economic benefits to participating in the open source ecosystem, he said. 他说，参与开源系统对公司来说有着重大的经济效益。 “We participate in Knative to share the development of our underlying platform but we develop value-added services as part of our business,” he said. “By sharing the R and D for the platform, it gives us more resources to develop our own differentiated technology.” “我们参与Knative是为了分享我们基础底层平台的开发，但作为业务的一部分，我们也拥有相关的增值服务。”他说，“通过共享该平台的研发，这为我们提供了更多的资源来改进我们自己的差异化技术。” Part4How to Get Started in Open Source Sixty-three percent of companies in the September survey from The New Stack, Linux Foundation Research and the TODO Group said that having an OSPO was very or extremely critical to the success of their engineering or product teams, up from 54% in the previous annual study. 在 The New Stack、Linux Foundation Research 和 TODO Group 的 9 月份调查中，有 63% 的公司表示，拥有OSPO 对其工程或产品团队的成功至关重要，高于上一年度该项研究数据的 54%。 In particular, 77% said that their open source program had a positive impact on their software practices, such as improved code quality. 其中77% 的人表示他们的开源程序对他们的软件实践产生了积极影响，例如提高了代码质量。 But companies can’t always contribute to every single open source project that they use. 但公司也不可能总是为他们使用的每一个开源项目而花费精力。 “First, thin the herd a little bit,” advised VMware’s Ambiel. “首先，节流一下”，VMware 的 Ambiel 建议道。 Companies should look at the projects that make the most sense for their use cases. This is an area where an OSPO can help set priorities and ensure technical and strategic alignment. 公司应该关注投入使用中最有意义的项目。而这也是OSPO可以帮助确定优先事项并确保技术与战略一致性的领域。 Then, developers should go and check out the projects themselves. Projects typically offer online documentation, often with contributor guides, governance documents, and lists of open issues. 之后，开发人员应该自己去了解一下。项目通常提供相关在线文档，一般包含贡献着指南、治理文档和未解决问题列表。 “For the projects that rise to the top of your strategic list, introduce yourself — say hello,” she said. “Go to the Slack channel or the distribution list and ask where they need help. Maybe they don’t need help and everything is good. Or maybe they can use a new person to review code.” “对于那些上升到你的战略清单顶端的项目，你可以介绍一下自己----打个招呼”，她说。“然后转到Slack频道或者分发列表，询问他们需要帮助的地方。也许他们不需要帮助，一切完好；又或者他们也有可能使用新人来审查核验代码。” An open source program office can not only help make a business case for contributing to the open source community, Ambiel said, but can help companies do it in a way that’s safe, secure and sound. Ambiel 说，开源项目办公室不仅可以帮助制定为开源社区做出贡献的商业案例，还可以帮助公司以安全、可靠和健全的方式来做这件事。 “If I work for a company and want to contribute to open source, I don’t want to accidentally disclose, divulge or undermine any patents,” she said. “An OSPO helps you make smart choices.” “如果我为一家公司工作，并想为开源做出贡献，我不想意外披露、泄露或破坏任何专利，”她说。“而OSPO可以帮助您做出明智的选择。” An OSPO can also help provide leadership and the guiding philosophy about supporting open source, she said. “It can provide guidance, mentorship, coaching and best practices.” 她说，OSPO还可以在开源方面提供领导力和指导理念的支持。“它可以提供引领、指导、辅导和最佳实践的作用。” Commitment to support open source has to start at the top, said Anaïs Urlichs, developer advocate at Aqua Security. Aqua Security的开发人员倡导者Anaïs Urlichs则认为，支持开源的承诺必须从高层开始。 “Too often,” she said, “companies do not value investment into open source, so employees are not encouraged to contribute to it.” 她说，“公司在多数时候往往不重视对开源的投资，所以员工自然而然不被鼓励对此作出贡献。” In those cases, employees with a passion for open source end up contributing during their free time, which is not sustainable. 在这些情况下，员工对于开源的热情也会在空闲时间里对开源的建设而消散殆尽，这对于开源的发展来说是不可持续的。 “If companies rely on open source projects, it is important to make open source contributions part of an engineer’s work schedule,” she said. “Some companies define a time percentage that employees can contribute to open source as part of their normal workday.” “如果公司对开源项目依赖度高，那么将开源贡献纳入工程师的日程安排是很重要的，”她说。“一些公司定义了员工可以为开源建设的时间百分比，将其作为他们正常工作日的一部分。” The New Stack is a wholly owned subsidiary of Insight Partners, an investor in the following companies mentioned in this article: Sysdig, Aqua Security. The New Stack 是 Insight Partners 的全资子公司，Insight Partners 是本文提到的以下公司的投资者：Sysdig、Aqua Security。 相关阅读 | Related Reading 《开源合规指南（企业篇）》正式发布，为推动我国开源合规建设提供参考 “目标->用户->指标”——企业开源运营之道｜瞰道@谭中意 开源之夏邀请函——仅限高校学子开启 开源社简介 开源社成立于 2014 年，是由志愿贡献于开源事业的个人成员，依 “贡献、共识、共治” 原则所组成，始终维持厂商中立、公益、非营利的特点，是最早以 “开源治理、国际接轨、社区发展、开源项目” 为使命的开源社区联合体。开源社积极与支持开源的社区、企业以及政府相关单位紧密合作，以 “立足中国、贡献全球” 为愿景，旨在共创健康可持续发展的开源生态，推动中国开源社区成为全球开源体系的积极参与及贡献者。 2017 年，开源社转型为完全由个人成员组成，参照 ASF 等国际顶级开源基金会的治理模式运作。近八年来，链接了数万名开源人，集聚了上千名社区成员及志愿者、海内外数百位讲师，合作了近百家赞助、媒体、社区伙伴。 本篇文章为转载内容。原文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/kaiyuanshe/article/details/124976824。 该文由互联网用户投稿提供，文中观点代表作者本人意见，并不代表本站的立场。 作为信息平台，本站仅提供文章转载服务，并不拥有其所有权，也不对文章内容的真实性、准确性和合法性承担责任。 如发现本文存在侵权、违法、违规或事实不符的情况，请及时联系我们，我们将第一时间进行核实并删除相应内容。